{"id":1606,"date":"2026-08-20T08:57:29","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T08:57:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/spline-shaping-vs-broaching-for-internal-spline-features\/"},"modified":"2026-08-24T07:38:22","modified_gmt":"2026-08-24T07:38:22","slug":"spline-shaping-vs-broaching-for-internal-spline-features","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/spline-shaping-vs-broaching-for-internal-spline-features\/","title":{"rendered":"Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"ss-lead\"><strong>Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features<\/strong> \u2014 Shaping and broaching can both produce internal splines, but they suit different geometries, volumes and tooling economics. Through-bores, blind features, part length, tooth form, production quantity and available inspection access all influence which process is practical.<\/p>\n<p>F\u00fcr <strong>spline shaping vs broaching<\/strong>Die zuverl\u00e4ssigste Spezifikation ist diejenige, die von Konstrukteur, K\u00e4ufer, Hersteller und Pr\u00fcfer gleicherma\u00dfen interpretiert werden kann. Die folgende Diskussion konzentriert sich auf messbare Zeichnungseingaben, Montagebedingungen und praktische Pr\u00fcfungen anstatt auf universelle Drehmoment-, Passungs- oder Lebensdauerangaben, die ohne vollst\u00e4ndige Geometrie- und Belastungsdaten nicht ermittelt werden k\u00f6nnen.<\/p>\n<h2>Shaping Tool Access<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Shaping Tool Access<\/strong> is a manufacturing decision that depends on tooth geometry, access, material condition, production volume and required accuracy. External and internal splines often need different tooling strategies, and shoulders or adjacent diameters can restrict tool approach.<\/p>\n<p>Define the finished tooth geometry and acceptance method first, then select a qualified process that can achieve them efficiently. Heat treatment may change the sequence: rough or soft cutting can occur before hardening, while grinding or another hard-finishing method is reserved for features that require correction after thermal distortion. For this topic, connect that decision to the mating component and the drawing revision used for the RFQ. When reviewing spline shaping vs broaching, revisit this point whenever the mating component, material condition or operating duty changes.<\/p>\n<h2>Broach Investment And Volume<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Broach Investment And Volume<\/strong> should be reviewed in the context of spline shaping vs broaching. Identify the mating component, operating function and drawing feature that this decision controls. The requirement should be measurable and connected to fit, torque transfer, alignment, wear or another defined assembly need.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the decision together with material condition, manufacturing sequence and inspection access. If the part is a replacement, compare unworn geometry and the mating member instead of copying damage. For new designs, keep open process choices flexible unless a specific process is itself required by the design. In this review, the useful acceptance criterion is the one that can be traced to a functional drawing characteristic. When reviewing spline shaping vs broaching, revisit this point whenever the mating component, material condition or operating duty changes.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"ss-inline-media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/process-cnc.webp\" alt=\"Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features - Broach Investment And Volume\"><\/figure>\n<h2>Blind Versus Through Internal Splines<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Blind Versus Through Internal Splines<\/strong> should be reviewed in the context of spline shaping vs broaching. Identify the mating component, operating function and drawing feature that this decision controls. The requirement should be measurable and connected to fit, torque transfer, alignment, wear or another defined assembly need.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the decision together with material condition, manufacturing sequence and inspection access. If the part is a replacement, compare unworn geometry and the mating member instead of copying damage. For new designs, keep open process choices flexible unless a specific process is itself required by the design. For repeat work, keep the same datum and measurement basis unless the assembly requirement changes. In a spline shaping vs broaching RFQ, keep this point tied to the mating member, datum scheme and finished-part acceptance method.<\/p>\n<h2>Size Range And Machine Stroke<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Size Range And Machine Stroke<\/strong> should be reviewed in the context of spline shaping vs broaching. Identify the mating component, operating function and drawing feature that this decision controls. The requirement should be measurable and connected to fit, torque transfer, alignment, wear or another defined assembly need.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the decision together with material condition, manufacturing sequence and inspection access. If the part is a replacement, compare unworn geometry and the mating member instead of copying damage. For new designs, keep open process choices flexible unless a specific process is itself required by the design. When the duty or mating member changes, revisit this point instead of carrying the previous assumption forward. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, record the resulting requirement on the drawing or purchase specification so it remains consistent on repeat orders.<\/p>\n<h2>Material Condition<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Material Condition<\/strong> should be selected from load, section size, hardening response, impact duty, wear requirements and the planned manufacturing route. Material grade and heat treatment form a combined decision; a higher-alloy steel is not automatically a better choice if the duty and geometry do not require it.<\/p>\n<p>The drawing should state the required material designation and final condition. If a material substitution is allowed, define the properties or approval process that control it. For shafts with several diameters or integrated gears, also consider how the heat-treatment route affects straightness and later finishing. For this topic, connect that decision to the mating component and the drawing revision used for the RFQ. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, record the resulting requirement on the drawing or purchase specification so it remains consistent on repeat orders.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"ss-inline-media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/process-milling.webp\" alt=\"Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features - Material Condition\"><\/figure>\n<h2>Tooling Lead Time<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Tooling Lead Time<\/strong> is a manufacturing decision that depends on tooth geometry, access, material condition, production volume and required accuracy. External and internal splines often need different tooling strategies, and shoulders or adjacent diameters can restrict tool approach.<\/p>\n<p>Define the finished tooth geometry and acceptance method first, then select a qualified process that can achieve them efficiently. Heat treatment may change the sequence: rough or soft cutting can occur before hardening, while grinding or another hard-finishing method is reserved for features that require correction after thermal distortion. In this review, the useful acceptance criterion is the one that can be traced to a functional drawing characteristic. When reviewing spline shaping vs broaching, revisit this point whenever the mating component, material condition or operating duty changes.<\/p>\n<h2>Eine praktische Wiederholungssequenz<\/h2>\n<p>A practical review sequence starts with the mating component and torque path, then confirms tooth system, engagement and the shaft features that locate the connection. Next define material and heat treatment, functional finishes and any runout or position requirements. For repeat work, keep the same datum and measurement basis unless the assembly requirement changes. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, apply this check to the specific spline shaping vs broaching interface shown on the current drawing.<\/p>\n<p>Finish by agreeing the inspection method, quantity and first-article documentation. This order prevents process or tolerance decisions from being made before the functional interface is understood and makes quotations easier to compare because the same design inputs are presented to each supplier. When the duty or mating member changes, revisit this point instead of carrying the previous assumption forward. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, apply this check to the specific spline shaping vs broaching interface shown on the current drawing.<\/p>\n<h2>Inspection Access<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Inspection Access<\/strong> should use a method that measures the drawing characteristic directly or functionally. Functional gages, analytical tooth measurement, CMM inspection, span measurements and measurements over pins or balls answer different questions and are not interchangeable by default.<\/p>\n<p>Agree the method before production when tolerance is tight or when customer and supplier use different equipment. Control temperature, cleanliness and gage calibration for repeatability. The inspection report should identify the drawing revision and datum setup so later lots can be compared on the same basis. For this topic, connect that decision to the mating component and the drawing revision used for the RFQ. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, apply this check to the specific spline shaping vs broaching interface shown on the current drawing.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"ss-inline-media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/inspection-cmm.webp\" alt=\"Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features - Inspection Access\"><\/figure>\n<h2>Alternatives Such As Skiving Or Edm Where Appropriate<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Alternatives Such As Skiving Or Edm Where Appropriate<\/strong> is a manufacturing decision that depends on tooth geometry, access, material condition, production volume and required accuracy. External and internal splines often need different tooling strategies, and shoulders or adjacent diameters can restrict tool approach.<\/p>\n<p>Define the finished tooth geometry and acceptance method first, then select a qualified process that can achieve them efficiently. Heat treatment may change the sequence: rough or soft cutting can occur before hardening, while grinding or another hard-finishing method is reserved for features that require correction after thermal distortion. In this review, the useful acceptance criterion is the one that can be traced to a functional drawing characteristic. In a spline shaping vs broaching RFQ, keep this point tied to the mating member, datum scheme and finished-part acceptance method.<\/p>\n<h2>H\u00e4ufige Fehler, die es zu vermeiden gilt<\/h2>\n<p>Common errors in spline shaping vs broaching come from treating one nominal value as if it defines the complete interface. Missing pressure angle, unclear datums, copied wear dimensions, unspecified hardness location and mismatched inspection methods can all create parts that look correct on paper but do not assemble consistently.<\/p>\n<p>A better review starts with the mating pair, identifies the load path and locating features, then connects geometry, material condition and inspection to those functions. Close open questions on the drawing before production and retain the agreed interpretation with the revision for repeat orders. For repeat work, keep the same datum and measurement basis unless the assembly requirement changes. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, record the resulting requirement on the drawing or purchase specification so it remains consistent on repeat orders.<\/p>\n<h2>Entscheidungszusammenfassung<\/h2>\n<div class=\"ss-table-wrap\">\n<table class=\"ss-spec-table\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Entscheidungsbereich<\/th>\n<th>Was zu best\u00e4tigen ist<\/th>\n<th>Warum es wichtig ist<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Paarungsgeometrie<\/td>\n<td>Zahnsystem, Durchmesser, Eingriff und Passung<\/td>\n<td>Kontrollierkompatibilit\u00e4t und Flankenkontakt<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Standort<\/td>\n<td>Bezugspunkte, Journale, Schultern und Auslauf<\/td>\n<td>Steuert die Ausrichtung in der Baugruppe<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Materialzustand<\/td>\n<td>G\u00fcteklasse, W\u00e4rmebehandlung, H\u00e4rte und Oberfl\u00e4chenbeschaffenheit<\/td>\n<td>Definiert den fertigen mechanischen Zustand und den Verschlei\u00dfzustand<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pflicht<\/td>\n<td>Drehmoment, Geschwindigkeit, Sto\u00df, Bewegung und Umgebung<\/td>\n<td>Verkn\u00fcpft die Teiledefinition mit den Betriebsbedingungen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inspektion<\/td>\n<td>Kontrollierte Merkmale und Messmethode<\/td>\n<td>Gew\u00e4hrleistet einheitliche Akzeptanz zwischen Lieferant und K\u00e4ufer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Checkliste f\u00fcr Spezifikationen<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Gegenst\u00fcck und \u00e4u\u00dfere\/innere Zahnausrichtung<\/li>\n<li>Modul oder Teilungssystem, Z\u00e4hnezahl, Eingriffswinkel und Au\u00dfen-\/Kerndurchmesser<\/li>\n<li>Effektives Einrasten, Passung oder Toleranzgrundlage und gegebenenfalls axiale Bewegung<\/li>\n<li>Werkstoff, W\u00e4rmebehandlung, H\u00e4rtebereich und funktionelle Oberfl\u00e4chenbeschaffenheit<\/li>\n<li>Bezugspunkte, Lager- oder Pilotdurchmesser, Rundlauf- und axiale Lageanforderungen<\/li>\n<li>Drehmoment, Drehzahl, Sto\u00df- oder Wechsellast, Schmierung und Betriebsumgebung<\/li>\n<li>Mengen-, Erstmuster- und vereinbarte Pr\u00fcfdokumentation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Verwenden Sie die <a href=\"\/de\/products\/\">Produktpalette an Keilwellen<\/a> um die verf\u00fcgbaren Konfigurationen und die <a href=\"\/de\/engineering\/spline-shaft-rfq-drawing-checklist\/\">Checkliste f\u00fcr Angebotsanfragen<\/a> to prepare a complete enquiry. When the duty or mating member changes, revisit this point instead of carrying the previous assumption forward. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, record the resulting requirement on the drawing or purchase specification so it remains consistent on repeat orders.<\/p>\n<h2>Engineering worksheet for spline shaping vs broaching<\/h2>\n<p>Verwenden Sie dieses Arbeitsblatt, um es umzudrehen <strong>Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features<\/strong> in Entscheidungen, die in einer Zeichnung dargestellt, w\u00e4hrend der Angebotserstellung \u00fcberpr\u00fcft und bei der Erstbemusterung verifiziert werden k\u00f6nnen. Beginnen Sie mit <strong>Shaping Tool Access<\/strong> Und <strong>Broach Investment And Volume<\/strong>Denn diese beiden Elemente definieren \u00fcblicherweise entweder die Geometrie der Passung oder die Materialbeschaffenheit, die der restliche Prozess erf\u00fcllen muss. Anschlie\u00dfend \u00fcberpr\u00fcfen <strong>Blind Versus Through Internal Splines<\/strong>, <strong>Size Range And Machine Stroke<\/strong> Und <strong>Material Condition<\/strong> gegen\u00fcber der tats\u00e4chlichen Baugruppe und nicht als unabh\u00e4ngige Katalogwerte zu behandeln.<\/p>\n<p>For a manufacturing-process decision, start from the finished tooth geometry and access conditions. Note whether the spline is external or internal, through or blind, close to a shoulder, integrated with a gear, or restricted by adjacent diameters. Those constraints influence tool approach, workholding and the practical choice between processes. Production quantity and material condition affect economics, but the drawing characteristic remains the acceptance target. In a spline shaping vs broaching RFQ, keep this point tied to the mating member, datum scheme and finished-part acceptance method.<\/p>\n<p>Build the inspection handoff around blind versus through internal splines. Define the datum setup, measurement stage and reporting requirement before the first article. Heat treatment can move features relative to each other, so runout, lead, tooth thickness or bore relationships may need to be verified after the final process rather than on a soft-machined blank. Where gages are used, agree what they prove and what analytical checks remain necessary.<\/p>\n<h3>Zeichen\u00fcberpr\u00fcfungssequenz<\/h3>\n<p>Vor der Produktionsanforderung ist die Zeichnung in der gleichen Reihenfolge zu pr\u00fcfen, in der die Baugruppe arbeitet: zusammenpassendes Zahnsystem, effektiver Eingriff, Bezugspunkte, angrenzende Zapfen oder Schultern, Werkstoff und W\u00e4rmebehandlung, funktionelle Oberfl\u00e4chen und Pr\u00fcfverfahren. <strong>spline shaping vs broaching<\/strong>Die Reihenfolge ist wichtig, weil sp\u00e4tere Entscheidungen wie die Prozessauswahl oder die Wahl des Messger\u00e4ts die Schnittstelle unterst\u00fctzen und nicht neu definieren sollten.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ss-table-wrap\">\n<table class=\"ss-spec-table\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Arbeitsblattelement<\/th>\n<th>Frage zur Beantwortung<\/th>\n<th>RFQ-Ausgabe<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Shaping Tool Access<\/td>\n<td>Welche Baugruppenfunktion wird von diesem Feature gesteuert?<\/td>\n<td>Ma\u00df-, Toleranz- oder Passungsbezug<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Broach Investment And Volume<\/td>\n<td>Welcher Endzustand muss erreicht werden?<\/td>\n<td>Material- \/ W\u00e4rmebehandlungs- \/ Oberfl\u00e4chenbezeichnung<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Blind Versus Through Internal Splines<\/td>\n<td>Wie wird das Merkmal \u00fcberpr\u00fcft?<\/td>\n<td>Pr\u00fcfmethode oder Berichtsvermerk<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Size Range And Machine Stroke<\/td>\n<td>Wie verh\u00e4lt sich das gegnerische Mitglied?<\/td>\n<td>Informationen zu Paarungsteilen und deren Verzahnung<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Material Condition<\/td>\n<td>Welches Datum legt den funktionalen Standort fest?<\/td>\n<td>Bezugspunkt und Auslauf<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2>\u00dcbergabe des Beschaffungsprozesses vor dem ersten Artikel<\/h2>\n<p>Ein n\u00fctzliches Einkaufspaket f\u00fcr <strong>Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features<\/strong> Die 2D-Zeichnung enth\u00e4lt die kontrollierte Zeichnung, die Menge, das Material und den W\u00e4rmebehandlungszustand, Informationen zur Passfl\u00e4che sowie die zu meldenden Abnahmekriterien. Wird ein 3D-Modell bereitgestellt, muss die 2D-Zeichnung weiterhin Toleranzen, Bezugspunkte, Hinweise zur W\u00e4rmebehandlung und Pr\u00fcfanforderungen enthalten. Geben Sie die aktuelle Revision in der Angebotsanfrage an, damit Fertigung und Pr\u00fcfung nicht mit unterschiedlichen Versionen arbeiten.<\/p>\n<p>When a characteristic is not yet decided, mark it for engineering clarification rather than inserting a convenient value. For spline shaping vs broaching, common open items are engagement, fit, hardness location, runout to an adjacent journal, internal-feature access or the condition of a worn mating component. Resolving those points before first article reduces avoidable rework and makes later repeat orders easier to control.<\/p>\n<h3>Checkliste vor der Ver\u00f6ffentlichung<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Confirm shaping tool access against the actual mating component.<\/li>\n<li>Confirm broach investment and volume in the finished condition.<\/li>\n<li>Define how blind versus through internal splines will be inspected.<\/li>\n<li>Check size range and machine stroke under the intended assembly condition.<\/li>\n<li>Relate material condition to the functional datum structure.<\/li>\n<li>Menge, Revisionsstand und etwaige Dokumentationsanforderungen f\u00fcr das Erstmuster angeben.<\/li>\n<li>\u00c4nderungen bei der Belastung, der Schmierung oder den passenden Verbindungsteilen f\u00fcr Nachbestellungen dokumentieren.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>H\u00e4ufig gestellte Fragen<\/h2>\n<details class=\"ss-faq\">\n<summary>What should I confirm about shaping tool access for spline shaping vs broaching?<\/summary>\n<p>Relate shaping tool access to the mating component and the assembly function first. Put the measurable requirement on the controlled drawing, and include the opposite member when compatibility depends on both parts. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, this prevents a nominal label from replacing the geometry that actually controls fit and torque transfer.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"ss-faq\">\n<summary>What should I confirm about broach investment and volume for spline shaping vs broaching?<\/summary>\n<p>Confirm broach investment and volume in the finished condition, including any material, heat-treatment, surface or dimensional state that can change after processing. If the requirement depends on a location or datum, show that explicitly so production and inspection use the same reference.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"ss-faq\">\n<summary>What should I confirm about blind versus through internal splines for spline shaping vs broaching?<\/summary>\n<p>Choose an inspection method that measures the characteristic named on the drawing. Functional gaging, analytical spline measurement, CMM checks, runout inspection, roughness measurement and hardness testing answer different questions. State which result is required for acceptance rather than requesting a generic inspection report. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, apply this check to the specific spline shaping vs broaching interface shown on the current drawing.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"ss-faq\">\n<summary>What should I confirm about size range and machine stroke for spline shaping vs broaching?<\/summary>\n<p>Check size range and machine stroke with the real mating part and intended assembly condition. Effective engagement, clearance, axial movement, temperature and wear in a replacement hub can all influence how the connection behaves. A new shaft should not be accepted or rejected from feel alone when a measurable fit requirement is available.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details class=\"ss-faq\">\n<summary>What should I confirm about material condition for spline shaping vs broaching?<\/summary>\n<p>Tie material condition to the features that locate rotation in the assembly. The drawing should make the datum reference and any runout or position relationship clear. If heat treatment or finish machining can move the feature, inspect the relationship at the stage that represents the finished part.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<h2>Von der technischen Entscheidung bis zur Produktionssteuerung<\/h2>\n<p>Once the interface is agreed, translate each functional decision into a drawing characteristic that can be manufactured and inspected. Avoid leaving key relationships only in email notes. Dimensions, datums, heat-treatment conditions and acceptance requirements should be revision-controlled so the production team and inspection team work to the same definition. For repeat work, keep the same datum and measurement basis unless the assembly requirement changes. In a spline shaping vs broaching RFQ, keep this point tied to the mating member, datum scheme and finished-part acceptance method.<\/p>\n<p>For first articles, prioritize the characteristics that prove assembly compatibility: tooth geometry, mating fit, relationship to locating journals or shoulders, heat-treatment condition and any critical runout. Record the measurement method together with the result. On repeat orders, using the same datum setup and measurement approach makes trend changes easier to recognize and reduces disputes caused by different inspection interpretations. When the duty or mating member changes, revisit this point instead of carrying the previous assumption forward. In a spline shaping vs broaching RFQ, keep this point tied to the mating member, datum scheme and finished-part acceptance method.<\/p>\n<p>When the operating duty changes, reopen the engineering review instead of assuming the old specification remains suitable. Higher torque, increased shock, more frequent reversals, different lubrication or a new mating component can change contact and wear even if the nominal spline size stays the same. The drawing should evolve with the actual assembly requirement. For this topic, connect that decision to the mating component and the drawing revision used for the RFQ. When reviewing spline shaping vs broaching, revisit this point whenever the mating component, material condition or operating duty changes.<\/p>\n<h2>Bereiten Sie die Angebotsanfrage vor.<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"ss-post-rfq-list\">\n<li>Aktuelle 2D-Zeichnung und \u00dcberarbeitung<\/li>\n<li>Partnerkomponente und Spline-Definition<\/li>\n<li>Material, W\u00e4rmebehandlung und funktionelle Oberfl\u00e4chen<\/li>\n<li>Drehmoment, Drehzahl, Belastung und Umwelt<\/li>\n<li>Mengen- und erforderliche Pr\u00fcfdokumentation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A complete enquiry combines the drawing, mating interface, material condition, duty, quantity and inspection expectations. When these inputs are defined early, suppliers can plan tooling, heat treatment, finishing and measurement around the same functional requirement, reducing clarification cycles before first article. In this review, the useful acceptance criterion is the one that can be traced to a functional drawing characteristic. For Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features, apply this check to the specific spline shaping vs broaching interface shown on the current drawing.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spline Shaping vs Broaching for Internal Spline Features \u2014 Shaping and broaching can both produce internal splines, but they suit different geometries,\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1564,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2945],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-manufacturing-inspection"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1606"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1724,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606\/revisions\/1724"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/splineshaft.top\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}